Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)

Taux de hachage 16.0 TH/s Puissance 1,280 W Efficiency 80.0 J/TH
VS
GMO miner B2

GMO miner B2

Taux de hachage 24.0 TH/s Puissance 1,950 W Efficiency 81.3 J/TH

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs GMO miner B2

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) Specification GMO miner B2
16.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 24.0 TH/s
1,280 W Consommation électrique 1,950 W
80.0 J/TH Efficiency 81.3 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
4,560.0 kg Weight
4,367 BTU/hr BTU Output 6,653 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Bitmain Manufacturer GMO miner

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)

Daily Revenue 0.00000736 BTC $0.58
Daily Electricity -$3.07
Daily Profit -$2.50
Monthly -$74.88
Yearly -$911.03

GMO miner B2

Daily Revenue 0.00001104 BTC $0.86
Daily Electricity -$4.68
Daily Profit -$3.82
Monthly -$114.48
Yearly -$1,392.83

Based on BTC price of $78,233 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Where it pulls away hardest is 34% better power draw (1,280 vs 1,950 W). The GMO miner B2 holds the edge in hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) — l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) and GMO miner B2 sit on each measurable spec:

  • GMO miner B2 50% more hashrate (16.0 vs 24.0 TH/s)
  • Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 34% better power draw (1,280 vs 1,950 W)
  • Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 2% better efficacité (80.0 vs 81.3 J/TH)
  • GMO miner B2 52% more heat output (4,367 vs 6,653 BTU/hr)
  • Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) 11% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 28.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th)

80.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or the GMO miner B2?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) is more profitable at $-2.50/day compared to $-3.82/day for the GMO miner B2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or GMO miner B2?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) or the GMO miner B2?

The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the GMO miner B2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) vs GMO miner B2: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Bitmain Antminer S9 SE (16Th) runs at 80.0 J/TH while the GMO miner B2 runs at 81.3 J/TH — a difference of 1.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 2% better efficacité (80.0 vs 81.3 J/TH).