Bitmain Antminer S9i (14Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9i (14Th) | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 37.0 TH/s |
| 1,320 W | Consommation électrique | 2,380 W |
| 94.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 64.3 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 4,200.0 kg | Weight | 7,600.0 kg |
| 4,504 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,121 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9i (14Th)
Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
Based on BTC price of $78,179 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 164% more hashrate (14.0 vs 37.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S9i (14Th) claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S9i (14Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 sit on each measurable spec:
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 164% more hashrate (14.0 vs 37.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9i (14Th) 45% better power draw (1,320 vs 2,380 W)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 32% better efficacité (94.3 vs 64.3 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S9i (14Th) 45% better weight (4,200 vs 7,600 kg)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 80% more heat output (4,504 vs 8,121 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S9i (14Th) 19% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S9i (14Th) | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 |
|---|---|---|
| $65 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.66 | Daily net profit | -$4.38 |
| -$1,037 | Net after 1 year | -$1,599 |
| -$2,010 | Net after 2 years | -$3,198 |
| -$2,982 | Net after 3 years | -$4,797 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S9i (14Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan AvalonMiner 104764.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S9i (14Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9i (14Th) is more profitable at $-2.66/day compared to $-4.38/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer S9i (14Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer S9i (14Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer S9i (14Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S9i (14Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1047: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S9i (14Th) runs at 94.3 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 runs at 64.3 J/TH — a difference of 30.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 32% better efficacité (94.3 vs 64.3 J/TH).