Bitmain Antminer T17e (53Th) vs Whatsminer M50S+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T17e (53Th) | Specification | Whatsminer M50S+ |
|---|---|---|
| 53.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 138.0 TH/s |
| 2,915 W | Consommation électrique | 3,276 W |
| 55.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 23.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| — | Weight | 13.0 kg |
| 9,946 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,178 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T17e (53Th)
Whatsminer M50S+
Based on BTC price of $78,175 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Whatsminer M50S+ comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 160% more hashrate (53.0 vs 138.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer T17e (53Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer T17e (53Th) and Whatsminer M50S+ sit on each measurable spec:
- Whatsminer M50S+ 160% more hashrate (53.0 vs 138.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T17e (53Th) 11% better power draw (2,915 vs 3,276 W)
- Whatsminer M50S+ 57% better efficacité (55.0 vs 23.7 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M50S+ 12% more heat output (9,946 vs 11,178 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M50S+ 64% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer T17e (53Th) | Metric | Whatsminer M50S+ |
|---|---|---|
| $650 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,500 |
| -$5.09 | Daily net profit | -$2.90 |
| -$2,508 | Net after 1 year | -$4,558 |
| -$4,365 | Net after 2 years | -$5,615 |
| -$6,223 | Net after 3 years | -$6,673 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M50S+Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M50S+23.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer T17e (53Th) or the Whatsminer M50S+?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M50S+ is more profitable at $-2.90/day compared to $-5.09/day for the Bitmain Antminer T17e (53Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer T17e (53Th) or the Whatsminer M50S+ better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Whatsminer M50S+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T17e (53Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer T17e (53Th) or Whatsminer M50S+?
The Whatsminer M50S+ scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T17e (53Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer T17e (53Th) and Whatsminer M50S+?
The Bitmain Antminer T17e (53Th) runs at 55.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50S+ runs at 23.7 J/TH — a difference of 31.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 57% better efficacité (55.0 vs 23.7 J/TH).