Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) vs NerdOctaxe Gamma
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) | Specification | NerdOctaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| 88.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 8.0 TH/s |
| 3,344 W | Consommation électrique | 200 W |
| 38.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 25.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 14,200.0 kg | Weight | 0.8 kg |
| 11,410 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 682 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 61/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)
NerdOctaxe Gamma
Based on BTC price of $78,185 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the NerdOctaxe Gamma edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 94% better power draw (3,344 vs 200 W) in the NerdOctaxe Gamma's favour. The Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) claws back ground on hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) and NerdOctaxe Gamma sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) 1000% more hashrate (88.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 94% better power draw (3,344 vs 200 W)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 34% better efficacité (38.0 vs 25.0 J/TH)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 100% better weight (14,200.0 vs 0.8 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) 1572% more heat output (11,410 vs 682 BTU/hr)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 177% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 61.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) | Metric | NerdOctaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| $596 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $599 |
| -$4.86 | Daily net profit | -$0.19 |
| -$2,370 | Net after 1 year | -$669 |
| -$4,143 | Net after 2 years | -$739 |
| -$5,917 | Net after 3 years | -$809 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
NerdOctaxe GammaScore: 61/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
NerdOctaxe Gamma25.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) or NerdOctaxe Gamma more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdOctaxe Gamma is more profitable at $-0.19/day compared to $-4.86/day for the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) or the NerdOctaxe Gamma better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) or NerdOctaxe Gamma?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma scores 61/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) vs NerdOctaxe Gamma: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) runs at 38.0 J/TH while the NerdOctaxe Gamma runs at 25.0 J/TH — a difference of 13.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 34% better efficacité (38.0 vs 25.0 J/TH).