Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) vs StrongU Hornbill H8
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) | Specification | StrongU Hornbill H8 |
|---|---|---|
| 10.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 74.0 TH/s |
| 1,432 W | Consommation électrique | 3,330 W |
| 136.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 45.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 4,200.0 kg | Weight | 11,500.0 kg |
| 4,886 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,362 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | StrongU |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)
StrongU Hornbill H8
Based on BTC price of $78,235 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the StrongU Hornbill H8 edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 605% more hashrate (10.5 vs 74.0 TH/s) in the StrongU Hornbill H8's favour. The Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) and StrongU Hornbill H8 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- StrongU Hornbill H8 605% more hashrate (10.5 vs 74.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) 57% better power draw (1,432 vs 3,330 W)
- StrongU Hornbill H8 67% better efficacité (136.4 vs 45.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) 63% better weight (4,200 vs 11,500 kg)
- StrongU Hornbill H8 133% more heat output (4,886 vs 11,362 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) 41% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) | Metric | StrongU Hornbill H8 |
|---|---|---|
| $955 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,200 |
| -$3.06 | Daily net profit | -$5.33 |
| -$2,071 | Net after 1 year | -$3,145 |
| -$3,188 | Net after 2 years | -$5,089 |
| -$4,304 | Net after 3 years | -$7,034 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
StrongU Hornbill H845.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) or the StrongU Hornbill H8?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) is more profitable at $-3.06/day compared to $-5.33/day for the StrongU Hornbill H8. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) or the StrongU Hornbill H8 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) vs StrongU Hornbill H8: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the StrongU Hornbill H8). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) and StrongU Hornbill H8?
The Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) runs at 136.4 J/TH while the StrongU Hornbill H8 runs at 45.0 J/TH — a difference of 91.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 67% better efficacité (136.4 vs 45.0 J/TH).