Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1246
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) | Specification | Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 |
|---|---|---|
| 12.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 90.0 TH/s |
| 1,576 W | Consommation électrique | 3,420 W |
| 126.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 38.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 3,800.0 kg | Weight | 12,800.0 kg |
| 5,377 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,669 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Canaan |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th)
Canaan AvalonMiner 1246
Based on BTC price of $78,293 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 620% more hashrate (12.5 vs 90.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) and Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 sit on each measurable spec:
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 620% more hashrate (12.5 vs 90.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) 54% better power draw (1,576 vs 3,420 W)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 70% better efficacité (126.1 vs 38.0 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) 70% better weight (3,800 vs 12,800 kg)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 117% more heat output (5,377 vs 11,669 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) 27% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) | Metric | Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $241 |
| -$3.33 | Daily net profit | -$4.97 |
| -$2,316 | Net after 1 year | -$2,053 |
| -$3,532 | Net after 2 years | -$3,866 |
| -$4,749 | Net after 3 years | -$5,678 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th)Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan AvalonMiner 124638.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) or Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) is more profitable at $-3.33/day compared to $-4.97/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1246. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1246: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) or the Canaan AvalonMiner 1246?
The Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1246). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) vs Canaan AvalonMiner 1246: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer T9 (12.5Th) runs at 126.1 J/TH while the Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 runs at 38.0 J/TH — a difference of 88.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 70% better efficacité (126.1 vs 38.0 J/TH).