Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T vs MicroBT Whatsminer M10S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T | Specification | MicroBT Whatsminer M10S |
|---|---|---|
| 215.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 55.0 TH/s |
| 3,612 W | Consommation électrique | 3,500 W |
| 16.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 63.6 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.9 kg | Weight | 10,700.0 kg |
| 12,324 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,942 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 291% more hashrate (215.0 vs 55.0 TH/s). That said, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T and MicroBT Whatsminer M10S sit on each measurable spec:
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 291% more hashrate (215.0 vs 55.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10S 3% better power draw (3,612 vs 3,500 W)
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 74% better efficacité (16.8 vs 63.6 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 100% better weight (14.9 vs 10,700.0 kg)
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 3% more heat output (12,324 vs 11,942 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 36% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T | Metric | MicroBT Whatsminer M10S |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,800 |
| -$0.93 | Daily net profit | -$6.42 |
| -$339 | Net after 1 year | -$6,143 |
| -$678 | Net after 2 years | -$8,487 |
| -$1,017 | Net after 3 years | -$10,830 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215TScore: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T16.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T vs MicroBT Whatsminer M10S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T is more profitable at $-0.93/day compared to $-6.42/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T vs MicroBT Whatsminer M10S: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T or the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S?
The Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T and MicroBT Whatsminer M10S?
The Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T runs at 16.8 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S runs at 63.6 J/TH — a difference of 46.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 74% better efficacité (16.8 vs 63.6 J/TH).