Canaan Avalon Mini 3 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M3X
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon Mini 3 | Specification | MicroBT Whatsminer M3X |
|---|---|---|
| 37.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 12.5 TH/s |
| 800 W | Consommation électrique | 2,050 W |
| 21.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 164.0 J/TH |
| 33 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 8.4 kg | Weight | 7,500.0 kg |
| 2,730 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,995 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon Mini 3
MicroBT Whatsminer M3X
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan Avalon Mini 3 comes out ahead — it takes 6 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 87% better efficacité (21.3 vs 164.0 J/TH) in the Canaan Avalon Mini 3's favour. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Canaan Avalon Mini 3 and MicroBT Whatsminer M3X diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan Avalon Mini 3 200% more hashrate (37.5 vs 12.5 TH/s)
- Canaan Avalon Mini 3 61% better power draw (800 vs 2,050 W)
- Canaan Avalon Mini 3 87% better efficacité (21.3 vs 164.0 J/TH)
- Canaan Avalon Mini 3 100% better weight (8.4 vs 7,500.0 kg)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M3X 156% more heat output (2,730 vs 6,995 BTU/hr)
- Canaan Avalon Mini 3 150% more score de minage domestique (65.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Canaan Avalon Mini 3 | Metric | MicroBT Whatsminer M3X |
|---|---|---|
| $710 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $350 |
| -$0.57 | Daily net profit | -$4.47 |
| -$918 | Net after 1 year | -$1,982 |
| -$1,126 | Net after 2 years | -$3,613 |
| -$1,335 | Net after 3 years | -$5,245 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan Avalon Mini 3Score: 65/100. 33 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon Mini 321.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Canaan Avalon Mini 3 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M3X: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon Mini 3 is more profitable at $-0.57/day compared to $-4.47/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M3X. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Canaan Avalon Mini 3 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M3X: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Canaan Avalon Mini 3 is quieter at 33 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M3X at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Canaan Avalon Mini 3 or the MicroBT Whatsminer M3X?
The Canaan Avalon Mini 3 scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M3X). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Canaan Avalon Mini 3 and MicroBT Whatsminer M3X on J/TH?
The Canaan Avalon Mini 3 runs at 21.3 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M3X runs at 164.0 J/TH — a difference of 142.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficacité (21.3 vs 164.0 J/TH).