Canaan Avalon Q vs NerdAxe
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan Avalon Q | Specification | NerdAxe |
|---|---|---|
| 90.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 500.0 GH/s |
| 1,674 W | Consommation électrique | 12 W |
| 18.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 24.0 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Niveau de bruit | 30 dB |
| 10.5 kg | Weight | 0.2 kg |
| 5,712 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 41 BTU/hr |
| 56/100 | Home Mining Score | 70/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan Avalon Q
NerdAxe
Based on BTC price of $78,183 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Canaan Avalon Q edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 17900% more hashrate (90.0 vs 0.5 TH/s). The NerdAxe holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Canaan Avalon Q and NerdAxe diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Canaan Avalon Q 17900% more hashrate (90.0 vs 0.5 TH/s)
- NerdAxe 99% better power draw (1,674.0 vs 12.0 W)
- Canaan Avalon Q 23% better efficacité (18.6 vs 24.0 J/TH)
- NerdAxe 33% better noise (45.0 vs 30.0 dB)
- NerdAxe 98% better weight (10.5 vs 0.2 kg)
- Canaan Avalon Q 13865% more heat output (5,711.7 vs 40.9 BTU/hr)
- NerdAxe 25% more score de minage domestique (56.0 vs 70.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Canaan Avalon Q | Metric | NerdAxe |
|---|---|---|
| $1,292 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $69 |
| -$0.78 | Daily net profit | -$0.01 |
| -$1,576 | Net after 1 year | -$73 |
| -$1,861 | Net after 2 years | -$77 |
| -$2,145 | Net after 3 years | -$81 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
NerdAxeScore: 70/100. 30 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Canaan Avalon Q18.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Canaan Avalon Q vs NerdAxe: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdAxe is more profitable at $-0.01/day compared to $-0.78/day for the Canaan Avalon Q. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Canaan Avalon Q or the NerdAxe better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The NerdAxe is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Canaan Avalon Q at 45 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Canaan Avalon Q or NerdAxe?
The NerdAxe scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 56/100 for the Canaan Avalon Q). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Canaan Avalon Q and NerdAxe?
The Canaan Avalon Q runs at 18.6 J/TH while the NerdAxe runs at 24.0 J/TH — a difference of 5.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 23% better efficacité (18.6 vs 24.0 J/TH).