Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 vs PiAxe
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 | Specification | PiAxe |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 500.0 GH/s |
| 2,380 W | Consommation électrique | 15 W |
| 64.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 30 dB |
| 7,600.0 kg | Weight | 0.2 kg |
| 8,121 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 51 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 70/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan AvalonMiner 1047
PiAxe
Based on BTC price of $78,215 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the PiAxe, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 99% better power draw (2,380.0 vs 15.0 W) in the PiAxe's favour. The Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 holds the edge in hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 and PiAxe actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 7300% more hashrate (37.0 vs 0.5 TH/s)
- PiAxe 99% better power draw (2,380.0 vs 15.0 W)
- PiAxe 53% better efficacité (64.3 vs 30.0 J/TH)
- PiAxe 100% better weight (7,600.0 vs 0.2 kg)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 15761% more heat output (8,120.6 vs 51.2 BTU/hr)
- PiAxe 169% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 70.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 | Metric | PiAxe |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $79 |
| -$4.38 | Daily net profit | -$0.02 |
| -$1,599 | Net after 1 year | -$86 |
| -$3,198 | Net after 2 years | -$92 |
| -$4,796 | Net after 3 years | -$99 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
PiAxeScore: 70/100. 30 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
PiAxe30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 or PiAxe more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the PiAxe is more profitable at $-0.02/day compared to $-4.38/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 or the PiAxe better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The PiAxe is quieter at 30 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 or the PiAxe?
The PiAxe scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1047). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 vs PiAxe: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Canaan AvalonMiner 1047 runs at 64.3 J/TH while the PiAxe runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 34.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 53% better efficacité (64.3 vs 30.0 J/TH).