Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 vs Whatsminer M50S++
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 | Specification | Whatsminer M50S++ |
|---|---|---|
| 90.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 160.0 TH/s |
| 3,420 W | Consommation électrique | 3,520 W |
| 38.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 22.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 12,800.0 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 11,669 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,010 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan AvalonMiner 1246
Whatsminer M50S++
Based on BTC price of $78,162 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Whatsminer M50S++, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 78% more hashrate (90.0 vs 160.0 TH/s). The Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 holds the edge in consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 and Whatsminer M50S++ sit on each measurable spec:
- Whatsminer M50S++ 78% more hashrate (90.0 vs 160.0 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 3% better power draw (3,420 vs 3,520 W)
- Whatsminer M50S++ 42% better efficacité (38.0 vs 22.0 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M50S++ 100% better weight (12,800.0 vs 13.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M50S++ 3% more heat output (11,669 vs 12,010 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M50S++ 36% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 | Metric | Whatsminer M50S++ |
|---|---|---|
| $241 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,000 |
| -$4.97 | Daily net profit | -$2.69 |
| -$2,055 | Net after 1 year | -$4,983 |
| -$3,870 | Net after 2 years | -$5,966 |
| -$5,684 | Net after 3 years | -$6,949 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M50S++Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M50S++22.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 vs Whatsminer M50S++: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M50S++ is more profitable at $-2.69/day compared to $-4.97/day for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1246. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 or the Whatsminer M50S++ better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Whatsminer M50S++ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 or the Whatsminer M50S++?
The Whatsminer M50S++ scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Canaan AvalonMiner 1246). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 and Whatsminer M50S++ on J/TH?
The Canaan AvalonMiner 1246 runs at 38.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50S++ runs at 22.0 J/TH — a difference of 16.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 42% better efficacité (38.0 vs 22.0 J/TH).