iPollo B1L vs Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo B1L | Specification | Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) |
|---|---|---|
| 58.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 137.0 GH/s |
| 3,000 W | Consommation électrique | 3 W |
| 51.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.3 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12,700.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 10,236 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | — |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Intel |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo B1L
Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better power draw (3,000.0 vs 2.5 W). The iPollo B1L claws back ground on hashrate and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo B1L and Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) sit on each measurable spec:
- iPollo B1L 42236% more hashrate (58.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) 100% better power draw (3,000.0 vs 2.5 W)
- Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) 65% better efficacité (51.7 vs 18.3 J/TH)
- iPollo B1L 120324% more heat output (10,236.0 vs 8.5 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iPollo B1L | Metric | Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) |
|---|---|---|
| $430 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$5.11 | Daily net profit | -$0.00 |
| -$2,296 | Net after 1 year | -$0 |
| -$4,162 | Net after 2 years | -$1 |
| -$6,028 | Net after 3 years | -$1 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo B1LScore: 22/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)18.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iPollo B1L vs Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-5.11/day for the iPollo B1L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iPollo B1L vs Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2): which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
iPollo B1L vs Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2): which fits a residential setup better?
The iPollo B1L scores 22/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iPollo B1L and Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)?
The iPollo B1L runs at 51.7 J/TH while the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) runs at 18.3 J/TH — a difference of 33.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 65% better efficacité (51.7 vs 18.3 J/TH).