iPollo B1L vs iPollo V2H
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo B1L | Specification | iPollo V2H |
|---|---|---|
| 58.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.4 GH/s |
| 3,000 W | Consommation électrique | 475 W |
| 51.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 139,705.9 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 65 dB |
| 12,700.0 kg | Weight | 7.9 kg |
| 10,236 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,621 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 55/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo B1L
iPollo V2H
Based on BTC price of $78,252 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the iPollo B1L edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 1705782% more hashrate (58.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the iPollo B1L's favour. That said, the iPollo V2H isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo B1L and iPollo V2H sit on each measurable spec:
- iPollo B1L 1705782% more hashrate (58.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V2H 84% better power draw (3,000 vs 475 W)
- iPollo B1L 100% better efficacité (51.7 vs 139,705.9 J/TH)
- iPollo V2H 100% better weight (12,700.0 vs 7.9 kg)
- iPollo B1L 532% more heat output (10,236 vs 1,621 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V2H 150% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 55.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iPollo B1L | Metric | iPollo V2H |
|---|---|---|
| $430 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,850 |
| -$5.11 | Daily net profit | -$1.14 |
| -$2,296 | Net after 1 year | -$2,266 |
| -$4,161 | Net after 2 years | -$2,682 |
| -$6,027 | Net after 3 years | -$3,098 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V2HScore: 55/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo B1L51.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo B1L or iPollo V2H more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V2H is more profitable at $-1.14/day compared to $-5.11/day for the iPollo B1L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iPollo B1L or the iPollo V2H better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iPollo V2H is quieter at 65 dB compared to the iPollo B1L at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iPollo B1L or the iPollo V2H?
The iPollo V2H scores 55/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo B1L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iPollo B1L vs iPollo V2H: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iPollo B1L runs at 51.7 J/TH while the iPollo V2H runs at 139,705.9 J/TH — a difference of 139,654.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (51.7 vs 139,705.9 J/TH).