iPollo V1 Hyd vs iPollo V2H
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Hyd | Specification | iPollo V2H |
|---|---|---|
| 900.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.4 GH/s |
| 800 W | Consommation électrique | 475 W |
| 888,888.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 139,705.9 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 65 dB |
| 8.0 kg | Weight | 7.9 kg |
| 2,730 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,621 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 55/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Hyd
iPollo V2H
Based on BTC price of $78,252 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the iPollo V2H, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 84% better efficacité (888,889 vs 139,706 J/TH) in the iPollo V2H's favour. The iPollo V1 Hyd holds the edge in rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo V1 Hyd and iPollo V2H sit on each measurable spec:
- iPollo V2H 278% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V2H 41% better power draw (800 vs 475 W)
- iPollo V2H 84% better efficacité (888,889 vs 139,706 J/TH)
- iPollo V2H 1% better weight (8.0 vs 7.9 kg)
- iPollo V1 Hyd 68% more heat output (2,730 vs 1,621 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V2H 83% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 55.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iPollo V1 Hyd | Metric | iPollo V2H |
|---|---|---|
| $489 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,850 |
| -$1.92 | Daily net profit | -$1.14 |
| -$1,190 | Net after 1 year | -$2,266 |
| -$1,891 | Net after 2 years | -$2,682 |
| -$2,591 | Net after 3 years | -$3,098 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V2HScore: 55/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V2H139,705.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iPollo V1 Hyd or the iPollo V2H?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V2H is more profitable at $-1.14/day compared to $-1.92/day for the iPollo V1 Hyd. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iPollo V1 Hyd or the iPollo V2H better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iPollo V2H is quieter at 65 dB compared to the iPollo V1 Hyd at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iPollo V1 Hyd or the iPollo V2H?
The iPollo V2H scores 55/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the iPollo V1 Hyd). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iPollo V1 Hyd vs iPollo V2H: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iPollo V1 Hyd runs at 888,888.9 J/TH while the iPollo V2H runs at 139,705.9 J/TH — a difference of 749,183.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 84% better efficacité (888,889 vs 139,706 J/TH).