iPollo V1 Classic vs iPollo V1 Hyd
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Classic | Specification | iPollo V1 Hyd |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 900.0 MH/s |
| 1,240 W | Consommation électrique | 800 W |
| 800,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 888,888.9 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 13,000.0 kg | Weight | 8.0 kg |
| 4,231 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,730 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Etchash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Classic
iPollo V1 Hyd
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le iPollo V1 Classic l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 72% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the iPollo V1 Classic's favour. The iPollo V1 Hyd claws back ground on consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo V1 Classic and iPollo V1 Hyd sit on each measurable spec:
- iPollo V1 Classic 72% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Hyd 35% better power draw (1,240 vs 800 W)
- iPollo V1 Classic 10% better efficacité (800,000 vs 888,889 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Hyd 100% better weight (13,000.0 vs 8.0 kg)
- iPollo V1 Classic 55% more heat output (4,231 vs 2,730 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Classic 3% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iPollo V1 Classic | Metric | iPollo V1 Hyd |
|---|---|---|
| $369 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $489 |
| -$2.98 | Daily net profit | -$1.92 |
| -$1,455 | Net after 1 year | -$1,190 |
| -$2,541 | Net after 2 years | -$1,891 |
| -$3,628 | Net after 3 years | -$2,591 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 ClassicScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V1 Classic800,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iPollo V1 Classic or the iPollo V1 Hyd?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Hyd is more profitable at $-1.92/day compared to $-2.98/day for the iPollo V1 Classic. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iPollo V1 Classic vs iPollo V1 Hyd: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V1 Classic or iPollo V1 Hyd?
The iPollo V1 Classic scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the iPollo V1 Hyd). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iPollo V1 Classic and iPollo V1 Hyd on J/TH?
The iPollo V1 Classic runs at 800,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Hyd runs at 888,888.9 J/TH — a difference of 88,888.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 10% better efficacité (800,000 vs 888,889 J/TH).