Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

iPollo V1

iPollo V1

Taux de hachage 3.6 GH/s Puissance 3,100 W Efficiency 861,111.1 J/TH
VS
iPollo V1 Classic

iPollo V1 Classic

Taux de hachage 1.6 GH/s Puissance 1,240 W Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH

iPollo V1 vs iPollo V1 Classic

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo V1 Specification iPollo V1 Classic
3.6 GH/s Taux de hachage 1.6 GH/s
3,100 W Consommation électrique 1,240 W
861,111.1 J/TH Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
13,000.0 kg Weight 13,000.0 kg
10,577 BTU/hr BTU Output 4,231 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithme Etchash
iPollo Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo V1

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$7.44
Daily Profit -$7.44
Monthly -$223.20
Yearly -$2,715.55

iPollo V1 Classic

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.98
Daily Profit -$2.98
Monthly -$89.28
Yearly -$1,086.22

Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the iPollo V1 Classic comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 60% better power draw (3,100 vs 1,240 W). The iPollo V1 claws back ground on hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: iPollo V1 Classic — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The iPollo V1 and iPollo V1 Classic diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • iPollo V1 132% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo V1 Classic 60% better power draw (3,100 vs 1,240 W)
  • iPollo V1 Classic 7% better efficacité (861,111 vs 800,000 J/TH)
  • iPollo V1 150% more heat output (10,577 vs 4,231 BTU/hr)
  • iPollo V1 Classic 41% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

iPollo V1 Metric iPollo V1 Classic
$1,699 Upfront cost (MSRP) $369
-$7.44 Daily net profit -$2.98
-$4,415 Net after 1 year -$1,455
-$7,130 Net after 2 years -$2,541
-$9,846 Net after 3 years -$3,628
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iPollo V1 Classic

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo V1 Classic

800,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the iPollo V1 or iPollo V1 Classic more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Classic is more profitable at $-2.98/day compared to $-7.44/day for the iPollo V1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

iPollo V1 vs iPollo V1 Classic: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V1 or iPollo V1 Classic?

The iPollo V1 Classic scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo V1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between iPollo V1 and iPollo V1 Classic?

The iPollo V1 runs at 861,111.1 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Classic runs at 800,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 61,111.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 7% better efficacité (861,111 vs 800,000 J/TH).