GMO miner B2

Taux de hachage 24.0 TH/s Puissance 1,950 W Efficiency 81.3 J/TH

Innosilicon T3 50T

Taux de hachage 50.0 TH/s Puissance 3,100 W Efficiency 62.0 J/TH

GMO miner B2 vs Innosilicon T3 50T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

GMO miner B2	Specification	Innosilicon T3 50T
24.0 TH/s	Taux de hachage	50.0 TH/s
1,950 W	Consommation électrique	3,100 W
81.3 J/TH	Efficiency	62.0 J/TH
—	Niveau de bruit	—
—	Weight	10,000.0 kg
6,653 BTU/hr	BTU Output	10,577 BTU/hr
28/100	Home Mining Score	22/100
—	Release Year	—
SHA-256	Algorithme	SHA-256
GMO miner	Manufacturer	Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

Electricity Rate:

$/kWh

GMO miner B2

Daily Revenue 0.00001104 BTC $0.86

Daily Electricity -$4.68

Daily Profit -$3.82

Monthly -$114.48

Yearly -$1,392.83

Innosilicon T3 50T

Daily Revenue 0.00002301 BTC $1.80

Daily Electricity -$7.44

Daily Profit -$5.64

Monthly -$169.20

Yearly -$2,058.57

Based on BTC price of $78,233 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Innosilicon T3 50T, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 108% more hashrate (24.0 vs 50.0 TH/s). The GMO miner B2 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Innosilicon T3 50T — l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the GMO miner B2 and Innosilicon T3 50T actually differ, with the gap quantified:

Innosilicon T3 50T 108% more hashrate (24.0 vs 50.0 TH/s)
GMO miner B2 37% better power draw (1,950 vs 3,100 W)
Innosilicon T3 50T 24% better efficacité (81.3 vs 62.0 J/TH)
Innosilicon T3 50T 59% more heat output (6,653 vs 10,577 BTU/hr)
GMO miner B2 27% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 22.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

GMO miner B2

Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon T3 50T

62.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the GMO miner B2 or the Innosilicon T3 50T?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the GMO miner B2 is more profitable at $-3.82/day compared to $-5.64/day for the Innosilicon T3 50T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the GMO miner B2 or the Innosilicon T3 50T better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

GMO miner B2 vs Innosilicon T3 50T: which fits a residential setup better?

The GMO miner B2 scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T3 50T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the GMO miner B2 and Innosilicon T3 50T on J/TH?

The GMO miner B2 runs at 81.3 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3 50T runs at 62.0 J/TH — a difference of 19.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 24% better efficacité (81.3 vs 62.0 J/TH).

Compare GMO miner B2 with...

Compare Innosilicon T3 50T with...

Shop Miners Browse our full catalog of ASIC miners, Bitaxe, and accessories. Réparation ASIC 2,500+ miners repaired. Expert diagnostics and board-level repair. Miner Database Compare 500+ miners with live profitability data.