Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

GMO miner B3

GMO miner B3

Taux de hachage 33.0 TH/s Puissance 3,417 W Efficiency 103.6 J/TH
VS

MicroBT WhatsMiner M73

Taux de hachage 512.0 TH/s Puissance 7,424 W Efficiency 14.5 J/TH

GMO miner B3 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M73

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

GMO miner B3 Specification MicroBT WhatsMiner M73
33.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 512.0 TH/s
3,417 W Consommation électrique 7,424 W
103.6 J/TH Efficiency 14.5 J/TH
Niveau de bruit 75 dB
5,000.0 kg Weight 27.5 kg
11,659 BTU/hr BTU Output 25,331 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
GMO miner Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

GMO miner B3

Daily Revenue 0.00001519 BTC $1.19
Daily Electricity -$8.20
Daily Profit -$7.01
Monthly -$210.39
Yearly -$2,559.79

MicroBT WhatsMiner M73

Daily Revenue 0.00023561 BTC $18.43
Daily Electricity -$17.82
Daily Profit $0.61
Monthly $18.28
Yearly $222.39

Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the MicroBT WhatsMiner M73, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 1452% more hashrate (33.0 vs 512.0 TH/s) in the MicroBT WhatsMiner M73's favour. The GMO miner B3 holds the edge in consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the GMO miner B3 and MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 sit on each measurable spec:

  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 1452% more hashrate (33.0 vs 512.0 TH/s)
  • GMO miner B3 54% better power draw (3,417 vs 7,424 W)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 86% better efficacité (103.6 vs 14.5 J/TH)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 99% better weight (5,000.0 vs 27.5 kg)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 117% more heat output (11,659 vs 25,331 BTU/hr)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 36% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 30.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

MicroBT WhatsMiner M73

$7.62/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

MicroBT WhatsMiner M73

Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

MicroBT WhatsMiner M73

14.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the GMO miner B3 or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M73?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 is more profitable at $0.61/day compared to $-7.01/day for the GMO miner B3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the GMO miner B3 or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the GMO miner B3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

GMO miner B3 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M73: which fits a residential setup better?

The MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the GMO miner B3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

GMO miner B3 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M73: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The GMO miner B3 runs at 103.6 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M73 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 89.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficacité (103.6 vs 14.5 J/TH).