Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Bitaxe Ultra

Bitaxe Ultra

Taux de hachage 500.0 GH/s Puissance 15 W Efficiency 30.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T3 50T

Innosilicon T3 50T

Taux de hachage 50.0 TH/s Puissance 3,100 W Efficiency 62.0 J/TH

Bitaxe Ultra vs Innosilicon T3 50T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitaxe Ultra Specification Innosilicon T3 50T
500.0 GH/s Taux de hachage 50.0 TH/s
15 W Consommation électrique 3,100 W
30.0 J/TH Efficiency 62.0 J/TH
35 dB Niveau de bruit
0.3 kg Weight 10,000.0 kg
51 BTU/hr BTU Output 10,577 BTU/hr
70/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
D-Central Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitaxe Ultra

Daily Revenue 0.00000023 BTC $0.02
Daily Electricity -$0.04
Daily Profit -$0.02
Monthly -$0.54
Yearly -$6.57

Innosilicon T3 50T

Daily Revenue 0.00002301 BTC $1.80
Daily Electricity -$7.44
Daily Profit -$5.64
Monthly -$169.23
Yearly -$2,058.93

Based on BTC price of $78,190 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitaxe Ultra edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better power draw (15.0 vs 3,100.0 W). The Innosilicon T3 50T holds the edge in hashrate. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Bitaxe Ultra — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Bitaxe Ultra and Innosilicon T3 50T actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Innosilicon T3 50T 9900% more hashrate (0.5 vs 50.0 TH/s)
  • Bitaxe Ultra 100% better power draw (15.0 vs 3,100.0 W)
  • Bitaxe Ultra 52% better efficacité (30.0 vs 62.0 J/TH)
  • Bitaxe Ultra 100% better weight (0.3 vs 10,000.0 kg)
  • Innosilicon T3 50T 20559% more heat output (51.2 vs 10,577.2 BTU/hr)
  • Bitaxe Ultra 218% more score de minage domestique (70.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Bitaxe Ultra Metric Innosilicon T3 50T
$79 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$0.02 Daily net profit -$5.64
-$86 Net after 1 year -$2,059
-$92 Net after 2 years -$4,118
-$99 Net after 3 years -$6,177
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Bitaxe Ultra

Score: 70/100. 35 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitaxe Ultra

30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Bitaxe Ultra or the Innosilicon T3 50T?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Ultra is more profitable at $-0.02/day compared to $-5.64/day for the Innosilicon T3 50T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Bitaxe Ultra or the Innosilicon T3 50T better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Bitaxe Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Innosilicon T3 50T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Bitaxe Ultra vs Innosilicon T3 50T: which fits a residential setup better?

The Bitaxe Ultra scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T3 50T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Bitaxe Ultra and Innosilicon T3 50T on J/TH?

The Bitaxe Ultra runs at 30.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3 50T runs at 62.0 J/TH — a difference of 32.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 52% better efficacité (30.0 vs 62.0 J/TH).