Antminer Loki Edition (S9) vs Bitaxe Ultra
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Specification | Bitaxe Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 500.0 GH/s |
| 1,350 W | Consommation électrique | 15 W |
| 96.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 6.0 kg | Weight | 0.3 kg |
| 4,606 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 51 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 70/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
Bitaxe Ultra
Based on BTC price of $78,268 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitaxe Ultra comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 99% better power draw (1,350.0 vs 15.0 W) in the Bitaxe Ultra's favour. The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) holds the edge in hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Bitaxe Ultra sit on each measurable spec:
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 2700% more hashrate (14.0 vs 0.5 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Ultra 99% better power draw (1,350.0 vs 15.0 W)
- Bitaxe Ultra 69% better efficacité (96.4 vs 30.0 J/TH)
- Bitaxe Ultra 36% better noise (55.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Bitaxe Ultra 95% better weight (6.0 vs 0.3 kg)
- Antminer Loki Edition (S9) 8896% more heat output (4,606.2 vs 51.2 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe Ultra 19% more score de minage domestique (59.0 vs 70.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer Loki Edition (S9) | Metric | Bitaxe Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| $349 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $79 |
| -$2.74 | Daily net profit | -$0.02 |
| -$1,348 | Net after 1 year | -$86 |
| -$2,346 | Net after 2 years | -$92 |
| -$3,345 | Net after 3 years | -$99 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe UltraScore: 70/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe Ultra30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Bitaxe Ultra more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Ultra is more profitable at $-0.02/day compared to $-2.74/day for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or the Bitaxe Ultra better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitaxe Ultra is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) or Bitaxe Ultra?
The Bitaxe Ultra scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 59/100 for the Antminer Loki Edition (S9)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer Loki Edition (S9) and Bitaxe Ultra on J/TH?
The Antminer Loki Edition (S9) runs at 96.4 J/TH while the Bitaxe Ultra runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 66.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 69% better efficacité (96.4 vs 30.0 J/TH).