Baikal BK-D vs Baikal Giant A900
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Baikal BK-D | Specification | Baikal Giant A900 |
|---|---|---|
| 320.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 900.0 MH/s |
| 1,100 W | Consommation électrique | 270 W |
| 3,437.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 300,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 6,500.0 kg | Weight | 2,550.0 kg |
| 3,753 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 921 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake256r14 | Algorithme | X11 |
| Baikal | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Baikal BK-D
Baikal Giant A900
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Baikal BK-D edges it: 2 of 3 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 35456% more hashrate (0.3 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Baikal Giant A900 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Baikal BK-D and Baikal Giant A900 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Baikal BK-D 35456% more hashrate (0.3 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal Giant A900 75% better power draw (1,100 vs 270 W)
- Baikal BK-D 99% better efficacité (3,438 vs 300,000 J/TH)
- Baikal Giant A900 61% better weight (6,500 vs 2,550 kg)
- Baikal BK-D 307% more heat output (3,753 vs 921 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Baikal BK-D | Metric | Baikal Giant A900 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,499 |
| -$2.63 | Daily net profit | -$0.65 |
| -$959 | Net after 1 year | -$2,735 |
| -$1,919 | Net after 2 years | -$2,972 |
| -$2,878 | Net after 3 years | -$3,209 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Baikal BK-D3,437.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Baikal BK-D or Baikal Giant A900 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Giant A900 is more profitable at $-0.65/day compared to $-2.63/day for the Baikal BK-D. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Baikal BK-D vs Baikal Giant A900: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Baikal BK-D or Baikal Giant A900?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
Baikal BK-D vs Baikal Giant A900: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Baikal BK-D runs at 3,437.5 J/TH while the Baikal Giant A900 runs at 300,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 296,562.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficacité (3,438 vs 300,000 J/TH).