Baikal BK-N vs Baikal Giant A900
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Baikal BK-N | Specification | Baikal Giant A900 |
|---|---|---|
| 40.0 KH/s | Taux de hachage | 900.0 MH/s |
| 60 W | Consommation électrique | 270 W |
| 1,500,000,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 300,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 1,800.0 kg | Weight | 2,550.0 kg |
| 205 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 921 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Cryptonight | Algorithme | X11 |
| Baikal | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Baikal BK-N
Baikal Giant A900
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Baikal Giant A900 comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficacité, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 2249900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Baikal BK-N isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Baikal BK-N and Baikal Giant A900 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Baikal Giant A900 2249900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal BK-N 78% better power draw (60.0 vs 270.0 W)
- Baikal Giant A900 100% better efficacité (1,500,000,000 vs 300,000 J/TH)
- Baikal BK-N 29% better weight (1,800 vs 2,550 kg)
- Baikal Giant A900 350% more heat output (205 vs 921 BTU/hr)
- Baikal BK-N 16% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Baikal BK-N | Metric | Baikal Giant A900 |
|---|---|---|
| $500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,499 |
| -$0.14 | Daily net profit | -$0.65 |
| -$553 | Net after 1 year | -$2,735 |
| -$605 | Net after 2 years | -$2,972 |
| -$658 | Net after 3 years | -$3,209 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal BK-NScore: 36/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Baikal Giant A900300,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Baikal BK-N vs Baikal Giant A900: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal BK-N is more profitable at $-0.14/day compared to $-0.65/day for the Baikal Giant A900. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Baikal BK-N vs Baikal Giant A900: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Baikal BK-N or Baikal Giant A900?
The Baikal BK-N scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Baikal Giant A900). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Baikal BK-N and Baikal Giant A900 on J/TH?
The Baikal BK-N runs at 1,500,000,000.0 J/TH while the Baikal Giant A900 runs at 300,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,499,700,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,500,000,000 vs 300,000 J/TH).