Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Baikal BK-G28

Baikal BK-G28

Taux de hachage 28.0 GH/s Puissance 1,300 W Efficiency 46,428.6 J/TH
VS
Baikal Giant+ A2000

Baikal Giant+ A2000

Taux de hachage 2.0 GH/s Puissance 450 W Efficiency 225,000.0 J/TH

Baikal BK-G28 vs Baikal Giant+ A2000

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Baikal BK-G28 Specification Baikal Giant+ A2000
28.0 GH/s Taux de hachage 2.0 GH/s
1,300 W Consommation électrique 450 W
46,428.6 J/TH Efficiency 225,000.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
6,550.0 kg Weight 2,980.0 kg
4,436 BTU/hr BTU Output 1,535 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 34/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithme X11
Baikal Manufacturer Baikal

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Baikal BK-G28

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$3.12
Daily Profit -$3.12
Monthly -$93.57
Yearly -$1,138.43

Baikal Giant+ A2000

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.08
Daily Profit -$1.08
Monthly -$32.40
Yearly -$394.17

Based on BTC price of $78,184 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Baikal BK-G28 edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 1300% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Baikal Giant+ A2000 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Baikal BK-G28 — l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Baikal BK-G28 and Baikal Giant+ A2000 sit on each measurable spec:

  • Baikal BK-G28 1300% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Baikal Giant+ A2000 65% better power draw (1,300 vs 450 W)
  • Baikal BK-G28 79% better efficacité (46,429 vs 225,000 J/TH)
  • Baikal Giant+ A2000 55% better weight (6,550 vs 2,980 kg)
  • Baikal BK-G28 189% more heat output (4,436 vs 1,535 BTU/hr)
  • Baikal Giant+ A2000 10% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 34.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Baikal Giant+ A2000

Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Baikal BK-G28

46,428.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Baikal BK-G28 or Baikal Giant+ A2000 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Giant+ A2000 is more profitable at $-1.08/day compared to $-3.12/day for the Baikal BK-G28. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Baikal BK-G28 or the Baikal Giant+ A2000 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Baikal BK-G28 or Baikal Giant+ A2000?

The Baikal Giant+ A2000 scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Baikal BK-G28). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Baikal BK-G28 and Baikal Giant+ A2000?

The Baikal BK-G28 runs at 46,428.6 J/TH while the Baikal Giant+ A2000 runs at 225,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 178,571.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 79% better efficacité (46,429 vs 225,000 J/TH).