Baikal BK-N240 vs Baikal Giant+ A2000
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Baikal BK-N240 | Specification | Baikal Giant+ A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 480.0 KH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 GH/s |
| 650 W | Consommation électrique | 450 W |
| 1,354,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 225,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 6,500.0 kg | Weight | 2,980.0 kg |
| 2,218 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,535 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Cryptonight | Algorithme | X11 |
| Baikal | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Baikal BK-N240
Baikal Giant+ A2000
Based on BTC price of $78,237 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Baikal Giant+ A2000, which leads on 4 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficacité (1,354,166,667 vs 225,000 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Baikal BK-N240 and Baikal Giant+ A2000 sit on each measurable spec:
- Baikal Giant+ A2000 416567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal Giant+ A2000 31% better power draw (650 vs 450 W)
- Baikal Giant+ A2000 100% better efficacité (1,354,166,667 vs 225,000 J/TH)
- Baikal Giant+ A2000 54% better weight (6,500 vs 2,980 kg)
- Baikal BK-N240 44% more heat output (2,218 vs 1,535 BTU/hr)
- Baikal Giant+ A2000 13% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 34.0)
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal Giant+ A2000Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Baikal Giant+ A2000225,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Baikal BK-N240 vs Baikal Giant+ A2000: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Giant+ A2000 is more profitable at $-1.08/day compared to $-1.56/day for the Baikal BK-N240. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Baikal BK-N240 or the Baikal Giant+ A2000 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Baikal BK-N240 or the Baikal Giant+ A2000?
The Baikal Giant+ A2000 scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Baikal BK-N240). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Baikal BK-N240 and Baikal Giant+ A2000?
The Baikal BK-N240 runs at 1,354,166,666.7 J/TH while the Baikal Giant+ A2000 runs at 225,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,353,941,666.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,354,166,667 vs 225,000 J/TH).