Baikal BK-N vs Baikal Miner Cube
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Baikal BK-N | Specification | Baikal Miner Cube |
|---|---|---|
| 40.0 KH/s | Taux de hachage | 300.0 MH/s |
| 60 W | Consommation électrique | 90 W |
| 1,500,000,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 300,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 1,800.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 205 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 307 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Cryptonight | Algorithme | X11 |
| Baikal | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Baikal BK-N
Baikal Miner Cube
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Baikal Miner Cube comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 3 (efficacité, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 749900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Baikal BK-N holds the edge in consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Baikal BK-N and Baikal Miner Cube sit on each measurable spec:
- Baikal Miner Cube 749900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal BK-N 33% better power draw (60.0 vs 90.0 W)
- Baikal Miner Cube 100% better efficacité (1,500,000,000 vs 300,000 J/TH)
- Baikal Miner Cube 50% more heat output (205 vs 307 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Baikal BK-N | Metric | Baikal Miner Cube |
|---|---|---|
| $500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,000 |
| -$0.14 | Daily net profit | -$0.22 |
| -$553 | Net after 1 year | -$1,079 |
| -$605 | Net after 2 years | -$1,158 |
| -$658 | Net after 3 years | -$1,236 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Baikal Miner Cube300,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Baikal BK-N or Baikal Miner Cube more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal BK-N is more profitable at $-0.14/day compared to $-0.22/day for the Baikal Miner Cube. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Baikal BK-N vs Baikal Miner Cube: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Baikal BK-N or the Baikal Miner Cube?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between Baikal BK-N and Baikal Miner Cube?
The Baikal BK-N runs at 1,500,000,000.0 J/TH while the Baikal Miner Cube runs at 300,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,499,700,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,500,000,000 vs 300,000 J/TH).