Baikal BK-N240 vs Baikal Miner Cube
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Baikal BK-N240 | Specification | Baikal Miner Cube |
|---|---|---|
| 480.0 KH/s | Taux de hachage | 300.0 MH/s |
| 650 W | Consommation électrique | 90 W |
| 1,354,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 300,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 6,500.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 2,218 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 307 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Cryptonight | Algorithme | X11 |
| Baikal | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Baikal BK-N240
Baikal Miner Cube
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Baikal Miner Cube l'emporte sur 3 des 3 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). The standout gap is 100% better efficacité (1,354,166,667 vs 300,000 J/TH) in the Baikal Miner Cube's favour. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Baikal BK-N240 and Baikal Miner Cube sit on each measurable spec:
- Baikal Miner Cube 62400% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal Miner Cube 86% better power draw (650.0 vs 90.0 W)
- Baikal Miner Cube 100% better efficacité (1,354,166,667 vs 300,000 J/TH)
- Baikal BK-N240 622% more heat output (2,218 vs 307 BTU/hr)
- Baikal Miner Cube 20% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Baikal BK-N240 | Metric | Baikal Miner Cube |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,000 |
| -$1.56 | Daily net profit | -$0.22 |
| -$569 | Net after 1 year | -$1,079 |
| -$1,139 | Net after 2 years | -$1,158 |
| -$1,708 | Net after 3 years | -$1,236 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal Miner CubeScore: 36/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Baikal Miner Cube300,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Baikal BK-N240 or Baikal Miner Cube more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Miner Cube is more profitable at $-0.22/day compared to $-1.56/day for the Baikal BK-N240. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Baikal BK-N240 or the Baikal Miner Cube better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Baikal BK-N240 or the Baikal Miner Cube?
The Baikal Miner Cube scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Baikal BK-N240). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Baikal BK-N240 and Baikal Miner Cube?
The Baikal BK-N240 runs at 1,354,166,666.7 J/TH while the Baikal Miner Cube runs at 300,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,353,866,666.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,354,166,667 vs 300,000 J/TH).