Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Baikal BK-X

Baikal BK-X

Taux de hachage 10.0 GH/s Puissance 630 W Efficiency 63,000.0 J/TH
VS
iBeLink DM11G

iBeLink DM11G

Taux de hachage 10.8 GH/s Puissance 810 W Efficiency 75,000.0 J/TH

Baikal BK-X vs iBeLink DM11G

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Baikal BK-X Specification iBeLink DM11G
10.0 GH/s Taux de hachage 10.8 GH/s
630 W Consommation électrique 810 W
63,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 75,000.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
3,700.0 kg Weight 19,000.0 kg
2,150 BTU/hr BTU Output 2,764 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithme X11
Baikal Manufacturer iBeLink

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Baikal BK-X

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.51
Daily Profit -$1.51
Monthly -$45.35
Yearly -$551.75

iBeLink DM11G

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.94
Daily Profit -$1.94
Monthly -$58.31
Yearly -$709.42

Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Baikal BK-X comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 3 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Where it pulls away hardest is 22% better power draw (630 vs 810 W). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Baikal BK-X — l'emporte sur 3 des 3 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Baikal BK-X and iBeLink DM11G actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • iBeLink DM11G 8% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Baikal BK-X 22% better power draw (630 vs 810 W)
  • Baikal BK-X 16% better efficacité (63,000 vs 75,000 J/TH)
  • Baikal BK-X 81% better weight (3,700 vs 19,000 kg)
  • iBeLink DM11G 29% more heat output (2,150 vs 2,764 BTU/hr)
  • Baikal BK-X 7% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 28.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Baikal BK-X

Score: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Baikal BK-X

63,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Baikal BK-X or iBeLink DM11G more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal BK-X is more profitable at $-1.51/day compared to $-1.94/day for the iBeLink DM11G. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Baikal BK-X or the iBeLink DM11G better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Baikal BK-X or the iBeLink DM11G?

The Baikal BK-X scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the iBeLink DM11G). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Baikal BK-X vs iBeLink DM11G: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Baikal BK-X runs at 63,000.0 J/TH while the iBeLink DM11G runs at 75,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 12,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 16% better efficacité (63,000 vs 75,000 J/TH).