Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

iBeLink BM-N1

iBeLink BM-N1

Taux de hachage 6.6 TH/s Puissance 2,400 W Efficiency 363.6 J/TH
VS
iBeLink DM11G

iBeLink DM11G

Taux de hachage 10.8 GH/s Puissance 810 W Efficiency 75,000.0 J/TH

iBeLink BM-N1 vs iBeLink DM11G

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iBeLink BM-N1 Specification iBeLink DM11G
6.6 TH/s Taux de hachage 10.8 GH/s
2,400 W Consommation électrique 810 W
363.6 J/TH Efficiency 75,000.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
9,900.0 kg Weight 19,000.0 kg
8,189 BTU/hr BTU Output 2,764 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
Eaglesong Algorithme X11
iBeLink Manufacturer iBeLink

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iBeLink BM-N1

Daily Revenue 0.00000304 BTC $0.24
Daily Electricity -$5.76
Daily Profit -$5.52
Monthly -$165.68
Yearly -$2,015.71

iBeLink DM11G

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.94
Daily Profit -$1.94
Monthly -$58.31
Yearly -$709.42

Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the iBeLink BM-N1 comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 61011% more hashrate (6.6 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the iBeLink BM-N1's favour. The iBeLink DM11G holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: iBeLink BM-N1 — l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-N1 and iBeLink DM11G actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • iBeLink BM-N1 61011% more hashrate (6.6 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iBeLink DM11G 66% better power draw (2,400 vs 810 W)
  • iBeLink BM-N1 100% better efficacité (364 vs 75,000 J/TH)
  • iBeLink BM-N1 48% better weight (9,900 vs 19,000 kg)
  • iBeLink BM-N1 196% more heat output (8,189 vs 2,764 BTU/hr)
  • iBeLink DM11G 8% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 28.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iBeLink DM11G

Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iBeLink BM-N1

363.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the iBeLink BM-N1 or iBeLink DM11G more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink DM11G is more profitable at $-1.94/day compared to $-5.52/day for the iBeLink BM-N1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

iBeLink BM-N1 vs iBeLink DM11G: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-N1 or the iBeLink DM11G?

The iBeLink DM11G scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the iBeLink BM-N1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

iBeLink BM-N1 vs iBeLink DM11G: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The iBeLink BM-N1 runs at 363.6 J/TH while the iBeLink DM11G runs at 75,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 74,636.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (364 vs 75,000 J/TH).