iBeLink BM-K3 vs iBeLink BM-N1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-K3 | Specification | iBeLink BM-N1 |
|---|---|---|
| 70.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.6 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 2,400 W |
| 47.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 363.6 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| — | Weight | 9,900.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,189 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2s | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-K3
iBeLink BM-N1
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le iBeLink BM-K3 l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 961% more hashrate (70.0 vs 6.6 TH/s) in the iBeLink BM-K3's favour. That said, the iBeLink BM-N1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-K3 and iBeLink BM-N1 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-K3 961% more hashrate (70.0 vs 6.6 TH/s)
- iBeLink BM-N1 27% better power draw (3,300 vs 2,400 W)
- iBeLink BM-K3 87% better efficacité (47.1 vs 363.6 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-K3 38% more heat output (11,260 vs 8,189 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-N1 18% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iBeLink BM-K3 | Metric | iBeLink BM-N1 |
|---|---|---|
| $820 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$5.40 | Daily net profit | -$5.52 |
| -$2,792 | Net after 1 year | -$2,016 |
| -$4,764 | Net after 2 years | -$4,031 |
| -$6,735 | Net after 3 years | -$6,047 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-N1Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-K347.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-K3 or iBeLink BM-N1 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-K3 is more profitable at $-5.40/day compared to $-5.52/day for the iBeLink BM-N1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-K3 or iBeLink BM-N1?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-K3 or iBeLink BM-N1?
The iBeLink BM-N1 scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-K3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iBeLink BM-K3 and iBeLink BM-N1 on J/TH?
The iBeLink BM-K3 runs at 47.1 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-N1 runs at 363.6 J/TH — a difference of 316.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficacité (47.1 vs 363.6 J/TH).