iBeLink BM-N3 Max vs Goldshell CK6
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-N3 Max | Specification | Goldshell CK6 |
|---|---|---|
| 30.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 19.3 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 3,300 W |
| 110.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 171.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 6.6 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-N3 Max
Goldshell CK6
Based on BTC price of $78,184 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the iBeLink BM-N3 Max comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 55% more hashrate (30.0 vs 19.3 TH/s) in the iBeLink BM-N3 Max's favour. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-N3 Max and Goldshell CK6 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-N3 Max 55% more hashrate (30.0 vs 19.3 TH/s)
- iBeLink BM-N3 Max 36% better efficacité (110 vs 171 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-N3 Max 100% better weight (6.6 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- iBeLink BM-N3 Max 64% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iBeLink BM-N3 Max | Metric | Goldshell CK6 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $799 |
| -$6.84 | Daily net profit | -$7.23 |
| -$2,497 | Net after 1 year | -$3,436 |
| -$4,994 | Net after 2 years | -$6,074 |
| -$7,490 | Net after 3 years | -$8,711 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-N3 MaxScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-N3 Max110.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink BM-N3 Max vs Goldshell CK6: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-N3 Max is more profitable at $-6.84/day compared to $-7.23/day for the Goldshell CK6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iBeLink BM-N3 Max or the Goldshell CK6 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iBeLink BM-N3 Max is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Goldshell CK6 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-N3 Max or the Goldshell CK6?
The iBeLink BM-N3 Max scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell CK6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iBeLink BM-N3 Max vs Goldshell CK6: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iBeLink BM-N3 Max runs at 110.0 J/TH while the Goldshell CK6 runs at 171.0 J/TH — a difference of 61.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 36% better efficacité (110 vs 171 J/TH).