iBeLink BM-N3 vs iBeLink DM22G
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-N3 | Specification | iBeLink DM22G |
|---|---|---|
| 25.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 22.0 GH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 810 W |
| 132.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 36,818.2 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| — | Weight | 19,000.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,764 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | X11 |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-N3
iBeLink DM22G
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the iBeLink BM-N3, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 113536% more hashrate (25.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the iBeLink BM-N3's favour. That said, the iBeLink DM22G isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The iBeLink BM-N3 and iBeLink DM22G diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iBeLink BM-N3 113536% more hashrate (25.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iBeLink DM22G 75% better power draw (3,300 vs 810 W)
- iBeLink BM-N3 100% better efficacité (132 vs 36,818 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-N3 307% more heat output (11,260 vs 2,764 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink DM22G 27% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| iBeLink BM-N3 | Metric | iBeLink DM22G |
|---|---|---|
| $980 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$7.02 | Daily net profit | -$1.94 |
| -$3,542 | Net after 1 year | -$709 |
| -$6,105 | Net after 2 years | -$1,419 |
| -$8,667 | Net after 3 years | -$2,128 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink DM22GScore: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-N3132.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-N3 or iBeLink DM22G more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink DM22G is more profitable at $-1.94/day compared to $-7.02/day for the iBeLink BM-N3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iBeLink BM-N3 or the iBeLink DM22G better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-N3 or iBeLink DM22G?
The iBeLink DM22G scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-N3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iBeLink BM-N3 and iBeLink DM22G on J/TH?
The iBeLink BM-N3 runs at 132.0 J/TH while the iBeLink DM22G runs at 36,818.2 J/TH — a difference of 36,686.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (132 vs 36,818 J/TH).