Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

iBeLink BM-N3

iBeLink BM-N3

Taux de hachage 25.0 TH/s Puissance 3,300 W Efficiency 132.0 J/TH
VS
Todek Toddminer C1

Todek Toddminer C1

Taux de hachage 1.6 TH/s Puissance 1,380 W Efficiency 890.3 J/TH

iBeLink BM-N3 vs Todek Toddminer C1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iBeLink BM-N3 Specification Todek Toddminer C1
25.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 1.6 TH/s
3,300 W Consommation électrique 1,380 W
132.0 J/TH Efficiency 890.3 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
Weight 4,600.0 kg
11,260 BTU/hr BTU Output 4,709 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
Eaglesong Algorithme Eaglesong
iBeLink Manufacturer Todek

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iBeLink BM-N3

Daily Revenue 0.00001150 BTC $0.90
Daily Electricity -$7.92
Daily Profit -$7.02
Monthly -$210.62
Yearly -$2,562.49

Todek Toddminer C1

Daily Revenue 0.00000071 BTC $0.06
Daily Electricity -$3.31
Daily Profit -$3.26
Monthly -$97.69
Yearly -$1,188.52

Based on BTC price of $78,184 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the iBeLink BM-N3 edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 1513% more hashrate (25.0 vs 1.6 TH/s). The Todek Toddminer C1 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: iBeLink BM-N3 — l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-N3 and Todek Toddminer C1 sit on each measurable spec:

  • iBeLink BM-N3 1513% more hashrate (25.0 vs 1.6 TH/s)
  • Todek Toddminer C1 58% better power draw (3,300 vs 1,380 W)
  • iBeLink BM-N3 85% better efficacité (132 vs 890 J/TH)
  • iBeLink BM-N3 139% more heat output (11,260 vs 4,709 BTU/hr)
  • Todek Toddminer C1 41% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

iBeLink BM-N3 Metric Todek Toddminer C1
$980 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$7.02 Daily net profit -$3.26
-$3,542 Net after 1 year -$1,189
-$6,105 Net after 2 years -$2,377
-$8,667 Net after 3 years -$3,566
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Todek Toddminer C1

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iBeLink BM-N3

132.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

iBeLink BM-N3 vs Todek Toddminer C1: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Todek Toddminer C1 is more profitable at $-3.26/day compared to $-7.02/day for the iBeLink BM-N3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

iBeLink BM-N3 vs Todek Toddminer C1: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-N3 or Todek Toddminer C1?

The Todek Toddminer C1 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-N3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-N3 and Todek Toddminer C1?

The iBeLink BM-N3 runs at 132.0 J/TH while the Todek Toddminer C1 runs at 890.3 J/TH — a difference of 758.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 85% better efficacité (132 vs 890 J/TH).