Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner

iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner

Taux de hachage 19.0 TH/s Puissance 3,100 W Efficiency 163.2 J/TH
VS
Goldshell SC Box II

Goldshell SC Box II

Taux de hachage 1.9 TH/s Puissance 400 W Efficiency 210.5 J/TH

iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner vs Goldshell SC Box II

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner Specification Goldshell SC Box II
19.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 1.9 TH/s
3,100 W Consommation électrique 400 W
163.2 J/TH Efficiency 210.5 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit 35 dB
14.0 kg Weight 2.3 kg
10,577 BTU/hr BTU Output 1,365 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 69/100
Release Year
Blake2b-sia Algorithme Blake2b-sia
iBeLink Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner

Daily Revenue 0.00000893 BTC $0.59
Daily Electricity -$7.44
Daily Profit -$6.85
Monthly -$205.41
Yearly -$2,499.17

Goldshell SC Box II

Daily Revenue 0.00000089 BTC $0.06
Daily Electricity -$0.96
Daily Profit -$0.90
Monthly -$27.02
Yearly -$328.76

Based on BTC price of $66,421 and current network difficulty as of Mar 28, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Le Goldshell SC Box II a l'avantage en consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Consultez les spécifications détaillées et les calculs de rentabilité ci-dessus pour déterminer quel mineur convient le mieux à votre installation.

Winner: iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner — l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell SC Box II

Score: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner

163.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner or Goldshell SC Box II more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC Box II is more profitable at $-0.90/day compared to $-6.85/day for the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner or Goldshell SC Box II?

The Goldshell SC Box II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner or Goldshell SC Box II?

The Goldshell SC Box II scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner and Goldshell SC Box II?

The iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner runs at 163.2 J/TH while the Goldshell SC Box II runs at 210.5 J/TH — a difference of 47.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.