iBeLink BM-KS Max vs iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Specification | iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner |
|---|---|---|
| 11.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 19.0 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Consommation électrique | 3,100 W |
| 309.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 163.2 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 12.2 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,577 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-KS Max
iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner
Based on BTC price of $73,537 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner, which leads on 4 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 47% better efficacité (309 vs 163 J/TH) in the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner's favour. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-KS Max and iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner 73% more hashrate (11.0 vs 19.0 TH/s)
- iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner 9% better power draw (3,400 vs 3,100 W)
- iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner 47% better efficacité (309 vs 163 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 13% better weight (12.2 vs 14.0 kg)
- iBeLink BM-KS Max 10% more heat output (11,601 vs 10,577 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iBeLink BM-KS Max | Metric | iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner |
|---|---|---|
| $1,799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,330 |
| -$7.79 | Daily net profit | -$6.81 |
| -$4,644 | Net after 1 year | -$3,815 |
| -$7,489 | Net after 2 years | -$6,300 |
| -$10,333 | Net after 3 years | -$8,785 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner163.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iBeLink BM-KS Max or the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner is more profitable at $-6.81/day compared to $-7.79/day for the iBeLink BM-KS Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink BM-KS Max vs iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-KS Max or the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-KS Max and iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner?
The iBeLink BM-KS Max runs at 309.1 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner runs at 163.2 J/TH — a difference of 145.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 47% better efficacité (309 vs 163 J/TH).