iBeLink BM-N3 vs iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-N3 | Specification | iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner |
|---|---|---|
| 25.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 19.0 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 3,100 W |
| 132.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 163.2 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| — | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,577 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-N3
iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner
Based on BTC price of $73,537 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the iBeLink BM-N3 edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 32% more hashrate (25.0 vs 19.0 TH/s) in the iBeLink BM-N3's favour. The iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-N3 and iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-N3 32% more hashrate (25.0 vs 19.0 TH/s)
- iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner 6% better power draw (3,300 vs 3,100 W)
- iBeLink BM-N3 19% better efficacité (132 vs 163 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-N3 6% more heat output (11,260 vs 10,577 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner 64% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iBeLink BM-N3 | Metric | iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner |
|---|---|---|
| $980 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,330 |
| -$7.09 | Daily net profit | -$6.81 |
| -$3,567 | Net after 1 year | -$3,815 |
| -$6,154 | Net after 2 years | -$6,300 |
| -$8,742 | Net after 3 years | -$8,785 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin MinerScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-N3132.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-N3 or iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner is more profitable at $-6.81/day compared to $-7.09/day for the iBeLink BM-N3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iBeLink BM-N3 or the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iBeLink BM-N3 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-N3 or the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner?
The iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iBeLink BM-N3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iBeLink BM-N3 vs iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iBeLink BM-N3 runs at 132.0 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-S3 Siacoin Miner runs at 163.2 J/TH — a difference of 31.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 19% better efficacité (132 vs 163 J/TH).