Goldshell CK Lite vs Bitmain CK6-SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell CK Lite | Specification | Bitmain CK6-SE |
|---|---|---|
| 6.3 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 17.0 TH/s |
| 1,200 W | Consommation électrique | 3,300 W |
| 190.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 194.1 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 80 dB |
| 8,100.0 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 4,094 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 29/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell CK Lite
Bitmain CK6-SE
Based on BTC price of $78,184 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell CK Lite l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Where it pulls away hardest is 64% better power draw (1,200 vs 3,300 W). The Bitmain CK6-SE claws back ground on hashrate and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell CK Lite and Bitmain CK6-SE sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain CK6-SE 170% more hashrate (6.3 vs 17.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK Lite 64% better power draw (1,200 vs 3,300 W)
- Goldshell CK Lite 2% better efficacité (190 vs 194 J/TH)
- Bitmain CK6-SE 100% better weight (8,100.0 vs 11.5 kg)
- Bitmain CK6-SE 175% more heat output (4,094 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK Lite 7% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 29.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell CK Lite | Metric | Bitmain CK6-SE |
|---|---|---|
| $748 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.65 | Daily net profit | -$7.31 |
| -$1,716 | Net after 1 year | -$2,668 |
| -$2,685 | Net after 2 years | -$5,335 |
| -$3,653 | Net after 3 years | -$8,003 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK LiteScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK Lite190.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell CK Lite or the Bitmain CK6-SE?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK Lite is more profitable at $-2.65/day compared to $-7.31/day for the Bitmain CK6-SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell CK Lite or Bitmain CK6-SE?
The Bitmain CK6-SE is quieter at 80 dB compared to the Goldshell CK Lite at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell CK Lite or Bitmain CK6-SE?
The Goldshell CK Lite scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Bitmain CK6-SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell CK Lite and Bitmain CK6-SE?
The Goldshell CK Lite runs at 190.5 J/TH while the Bitmain CK6-SE runs at 194.1 J/TH — a difference of 3.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 2% better efficacité (190 vs 194 J/TH).