Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell CK Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell CK Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.3 TH/s |
| 530 W | Consommation électrique | 1,200 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 190.5 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 8,100.0 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell CK Lite
Based on BTC price of $78,115 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell CK Lite comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 11666567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.3 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell AE-BOX II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell CK Lite diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell CK Lite 11666567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 56% better power draw (530 vs 1,200 W)
- Goldshell CK Lite 100% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 190 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 100% better weight (3.0 vs 8,100.0 kg)
- Goldshell CK Lite 126% more heat output (1,808 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 110% more score de minage domestique (65.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell CK Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $748 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$2.65 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$1,716 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$2,685 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$3,653 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK Lite190.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell CK Lite more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX II is more profitable at $-1.27/day compared to $-2.65/day for the Goldshell CK Lite. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell CK Lite: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell CK Lite at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell CK Lite?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell CK Lite). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell CK Lite: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell CK Lite runs at 190.5 J/TH — a difference of 9,814,624.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 190 J/TH).