Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell CK Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell CK Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.3 TH/s |
| 360 W | Consommation électrique | 1,200 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 190.5 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 8,100.0 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell CK Lite
Based on BTC price of $78,115 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell CK Lite edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 17026927% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.3 TH/s) in the Goldshell CK Lite's favour. The Goldshell AE-BOX holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell CK Lite diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell CK Lite 17026927% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 70% better power draw (360 vs 1,200 W)
- Goldshell CK Lite 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 190 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 100% better weight (2.3 vs 8,100.0 kg)
- Goldshell CK Lite 233% more heat output (1,228 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 123% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell CK Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $748 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$2.65 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$1,716 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$2,685 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$3,653 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK Lite190.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE-BOX or the Goldshell CK Lite?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-2.65/day for the Goldshell CK Lite. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX or the Goldshell CK Lite better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell CK Lite at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell CK Lite?
The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell CK Lite). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell CK Lite?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell CK Lite runs at 190.5 J/TH — a difference of 9,729,539.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,729,730 vs 190 J/TH).