VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) vs Goldshell Mini Doge II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) | Specification | Goldshell Mini Doge II |
|---|---|---|
| 16.2 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 420.0 MH/s |
| 3,700 W | Consommation électrique | 400 W |
| 228,395.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 952,381.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 15.6 kg | Weight | 2.3 kg |
| 12,624 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 69/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| VOLCMINER | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)
Goldshell Mini Doge II
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh), which leads on 2 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 3757% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)'s favour. The Goldshell Mini Doge II holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) and Goldshell Mini Doge II actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) 3757% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 89% better power draw (3,700 vs 400 W)
- VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) 76% better efficacité (228,395 vs 952,381 J/TH)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 53% better noise (75.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 85% better weight (15.6 vs 2.3 kg)
- VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) 825% more heat output (12,624 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell Mini Doge II 130% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 69.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) | Metric | Goldshell Mini Doge II |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $258 |
| -$8.88 | Daily net profit | -$0.96 |
| -$3,241 | Net after 1 year | -$608 |
| -$6,482 | Net after 2 years | -$959 |
| -$9,723 | Net after 3 years | -$1,309 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell Mini Doge IIScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)228,395.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) or the Goldshell Mini Doge II?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Mini Doge II is more profitable at $-0.96/day compared to $-8.88/day for the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) or Goldshell Mini Doge II?
The Goldshell Mini Doge II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) vs Goldshell Mini Doge II: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell Mini Doge II scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) vs Goldshell Mini Doge II: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) runs at 228,395.1 J/TH while the Goldshell Mini Doge II runs at 952,381.0 J/TH — a difference of 723,985.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 76% better efficacité (228,395 vs 952,381 J/TH).