VOLCMINER D1 Pro vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| VOLCMINER D1 Pro | Specification | Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 18.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 205.0 MH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 220 W |
| 194,444.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,073,170.7 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 21.0 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 751 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| VOLCMINER | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
VOLCMINER D1 Pro
Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,203 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le VOLCMINER D1 Pro l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 8680% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the VOLCMINER D1 Pro and Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- VOLCMINER D1 Pro 8680% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro 94% better power draw (3,500 vs 220 W)
- VOLCMINER D1 Pro 82% better efficacité (194,444 vs 1,073,171 J/TH)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro 53% better noise (75.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro 90% better weight (21.0 vs 2.0 kg)
- VOLCMINER D1 Pro 1491% more heat output (11,942 vs 751 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro 83% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| VOLCMINER D1 Pro | Metric | Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $7,850 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $299 |
| -$8.40 | Daily net profit | -$0.53 |
| -$10,916 | Net after 1 year | -$492 |
| -$13,982 | Net after 2 years | -$684 |
| -$17,047 | Net after 3 years | -$877 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell Mini-DOGE ProScore: 66/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
VOLCMINER D1 Pro194,444.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
VOLCMINER D1 Pro vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro is more profitable at $-0.53/day compared to $-8.40/day for the VOLCMINER D1 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
VOLCMINER D1 Pro vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro is quieter at 35 dB compared to the VOLCMINER D1 Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
VOLCMINER D1 Pro vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the VOLCMINER D1 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
VOLCMINER D1 Pro vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The VOLCMINER D1 Pro runs at 194,444.4 J/TH while the Goldshell Mini-DOGE Pro runs at 1,073,170.7 J/TH — a difference of 878,726.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 82% better efficacité (194,444 vs 1,073,171 J/TH).