Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) vs Elphapex DG Home 1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) | Specification | Elphapex DG Home 1 |
|---|---|---|
| 11.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 2,100.0 MH/s |
| 3,420 W | Consommation électrique | 630 W |
| 310,909.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 300,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 10.3 kg |
| 11,669 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,150 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 58/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Elphapex | Manufacturer | Elphapex |
Profitability Comparison
Elphapex DG 1 (11GH)
Elphapex DG Home 1
Based on BTC price of $78,237 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Elphapex DG Home 1 edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 82% better power draw (3,420 vs 630 W). That said, the Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) and Elphapex DG Home 1 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) 424% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Elphapex DG Home 1 82% better power draw (3,420 vs 630 W)
- Elphapex DG Home 1 4% better efficacité (310,909 vs 300,000 J/TH)
- Elphapex DG Home 1 40% better noise (75.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Elphapex DG Home 1 36% better weight (16.1 vs 10.3 kg)
- Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) 443% more heat output (11,669 vs 2,150 BTU/hr)
- Elphapex DG Home 1 61% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 58.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) | Metric | Elphapex DG Home 1 |
|---|---|---|
| $950 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,500 |
| -$8.21 | Daily net profit | -$1.51 |
| -$3,946 | Net after 1 year | -$3,052 |
| -$6,942 | Net after 2 years | -$3,604 |
| -$9,937 | Net after 3 years | -$4,156 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Elphapex DG Home 1Score: 58/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Elphapex DG Home 1300,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) or the Elphapex DG Home 1?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Elphapex DG Home 1 is more profitable at $-1.51/day compared to $-8.21/day for the Elphapex DG 1 (11GH). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) vs Elphapex DG Home 1: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Elphapex DG Home 1 is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) or the Elphapex DG Home 1?
The Elphapex DG Home 1 scores 58/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Elphapex DG 1 (11GH)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) and Elphapex DG Home 1 on J/TH?
The Elphapex DG 1 (11GH) runs at 310,909.1 J/TH while the Elphapex DG Home 1 runs at 300,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 10,909.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 4% better efficacité (310,909 vs 300,000 J/TH).