Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

PinIdea DR-3

PinIdea DR-3

Taux de hachage 600.0 MH/s Puissance 345 W Efficiency 575,000.0 J/TH
VS
StrongU STU-U6

StrongU STU-U6

Taux de hachage 440.0 GH/s Puissance 2,200 W Efficiency 5,000.0 J/TH

PinIdea DR-3 vs StrongU STU-U6

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

PinIdea DR-3 Specification StrongU STU-U6
600.0 MH/s Taux de hachage 440.0 GH/s
345 W Consommation électrique 2,200 W
575,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 5,000.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
Weight 7,200.0 kg
1,177 BTU/hr BTU Output 7,506 BTU/hr
34/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithme X11
PinIdea Manufacturer StrongU

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

PinIdea DR-3

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.83
Daily Profit -$0.83
Monthly -$24.84
Yearly -$302.21

StrongU STU-U6

Daily Revenue 0.00000020 BTC $0.02
Daily Electricity -$5.28
Daily Profit -$5.26
Monthly -$157.92
Yearly -$1,921.42

Based on BTC price of $78,200 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the StrongU STU-U6, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 73233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.4 TH/s). The PinIdea DR-3 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: StrongU STU-U6 — l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the PinIdea DR-3 and StrongU STU-U6 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • StrongU STU-U6 73233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.4 TH/s)
  • PinIdea DR-3 84% better power draw (345 vs 2,200 W)
  • StrongU STU-U6 99% better efficacité (575,000 vs 5,000 J/TH)
  • StrongU STU-U6 538% more heat output (1,177 vs 7,506 BTU/hr)
  • PinIdea DR-3 31% more score de minage domestique (34.0 vs 26.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

PinIdea DR-3 Metric StrongU STU-U6
Upfront cost (MSRP) $5,235
-$0.83 Daily net profit -$5.26
-$302 Net after 1 year -$7,156
-$604 Net after 2 years -$9,078
-$907 Net after 3 years -$10,999
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

PinIdea DR-3

Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

StrongU STU-U6

5,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

PinIdea DR-3 vs StrongU STU-U6: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the PinIdea DR-3 is more profitable at $-0.83/day compared to $-5.26/day for the StrongU STU-U6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the PinIdea DR-3 or StrongU STU-U6?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the PinIdea DR-3 or StrongU STU-U6?

The PinIdea DR-3 scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the StrongU STU-U6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the PinIdea DR-3 and StrongU STU-U6 on J/TH?

The PinIdea DR-3 runs at 575,000.0 J/TH while the StrongU STU-U6 runs at 5,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 570,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficacité (575,000 vs 5,000 J/TH).