Goldshell KD-BOX Pro vs SuperScalar K10
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell KD-BOX Pro | Specification | SuperScalar K10 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.6 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 45.0 GH/s |
| 75 W | Consommation électrique | 1,845 W |
| 28.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 41,000.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 1.1 kg | Weight | 8.3 kg |
| 256 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,295 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | SuperScalar |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro
SuperScalar K10
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell KD-BOX Pro l'emporte sur 6 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficacité (28.9 vs 41,000.0 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro and SuperScalar K10 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 5678% more hashrate (2.6 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 96% better power draw (75.0 vs 1,845.0 W)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 100% better efficacité (28.9 vs 41,000.0 J/TH)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 87% better weight (1.1 vs 8.3 kg)
- SuperScalar K10 2360% more heat output (256 vs 6,295 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 154% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell KD-BOX Pro | Metric | SuperScalar K10 |
|---|---|---|
| $699 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,200 |
| -$0.09 | Daily net profit | -$4.43 |
| -$731 | Net after 1 year | -$6,816 |
| -$762 | Net after 2 years | -$8,431 |
| -$794 | Net after 3 years | -$10,047 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KD-BOX ProScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro28.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro or the SuperScalar K10?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro is more profitable at $-0.09/day compared to $-4.43/day for the SuperScalar K10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro or SuperScalar K10?
The Goldshell KD-BOX Pro is quieter at 35 dB compared to the SuperScalar K10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro or SuperScalar K10?
The Goldshell KD-BOX Pro scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the SuperScalar K10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro vs SuperScalar K10: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell KD-BOX Pro runs at 28.9 J/TH while the SuperScalar K10 runs at 41,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 40,971.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (28.9 vs 41,000.0 J/TH).