IceRiver AL0 vs Iceriver KS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver AL0 | Specification | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 400.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 8.0 TH/s |
| 100 W | Consommation électrique | 3,200 W |
| 250,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 400.0 J/TH |
| 10 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver AL0
Iceriver KS3
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Iceriver KS3 l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 1999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 8.0 TH/s) in the Iceriver KS3's favour. The IceRiver AL0 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver AL0 and Iceriver KS3 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver KS3 1999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver AL0 97% better power draw (100 vs 3,200 W)
- Iceriver KS3 100% better efficacité (250,000 vs 400 J/TH)
- IceRiver AL0 87% better noise (10.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- IceRiver AL0 81% better weight (2.5 vs 13.5 kg)
- Iceriver KS3 3100% more heat output (341 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver AL0 97% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| IceRiver AL0 | Metric | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $199 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $730 |
| -$0.24 | Daily net profit | -$7.39 |
| -$287 | Net after 1 year | -$3,428 |
| -$374 | Net after 2 years | -$6,126 |
| -$462 | Net after 3 years | -$8,824 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver AL0Score: 71/100. 10 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS3400.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
IceRiver AL0 vs Iceriver KS3: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver AL0 is more profitable at $-0.24/day compared to $-7.39/day for the Iceriver KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the IceRiver AL0 or Iceriver KS3?
The IceRiver AL0 is quieter at 10 dB compared to the Iceriver KS3 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the IceRiver AL0 or Iceriver KS3?
The IceRiver AL0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the IceRiver AL0 and Iceriver KS3 on J/TH?
The IceRiver AL0 runs at 250,000.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH — a difference of 249,600.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (250,000 vs 400 J/TH).