Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver KS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AL3 | Specification | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 8.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 3,200 W |
| 233.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 400.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AL3
Iceriver KS3
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Iceriver AL3 l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 88% more hashrate (15.0 vs 8.0 TH/s). The Iceriver KS3 claws back ground on consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver AL3 and Iceriver KS3 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver AL3 88% more hashrate (15.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS3 9% better power draw (3,500 vs 3,200 W)
- Iceriver AL3 42% better efficacité (233 vs 400 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS3 16% better weight (16.0 vs 13.5 kg)
- Iceriver AL3 9% more heat output (11,942 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver AL3 | Metric | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $730 |
| -$7.86 | Daily net profit | -$7.39 |
| -$4,419 | Net after 1 year | -$3,428 |
| -$7,288 | Net after 2 years | -$6,126 |
| -$10,157 | Net after 3 years | -$8,824 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver AL3 or the Iceriver KS3?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS3 is more profitable at $-7.39/day compared to $-7.86/day for the Iceriver AL3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver AL3 or the Iceriver KS3 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver KS3: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver KS3: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH — a difference of 166.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 42% better efficacité (233 vs 400 J/TH).