IceRiver KS0 Pro vs Iceriver KAS KS5M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS0 Pro | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS5M |
|---|---|---|
| 200.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 15.0 TH/s |
| 100 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 500.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 226.7 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS0 Pro
Iceriver KAS KS5M
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KAS KS5M, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 7400% more hashrate (0.2 vs 15.0 TH/s). The IceRiver KS0 Pro claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver KS0 Pro and Iceriver KAS KS5M actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 7400% more hashrate (0.2 vs 15.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 97% better power draw (100 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 55% better efficacité (500 vs 227 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 53% better noise (35.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 83% better weight (2.5 vs 15.0 kg)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 3300% more heat output (341 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 97% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| IceRiver KS0 Pro | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS5M |
|---|---|---|
| $199 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $449 |
| -$0.23 | Daily net profit | -$7.62 |
| -$284 | Net after 1 year | -$3,230 |
| -$369 | Net after 2 years | -$6,012 |
| -$454 | Net after 3 years | -$8,793 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS0 ProScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS5M226.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
IceRiver KS0 Pro vs Iceriver KAS KS5M: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-7.62/day for the Iceriver KAS KS5M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the IceRiver KS0 Pro or Iceriver KAS KS5M?
The IceRiver KS0 Pro is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS5M at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
IceRiver KS0 Pro vs Iceriver KAS KS5M: which fits a residential setup better?
The IceRiver KS0 Pro scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KAS KS5M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between IceRiver KS0 Pro and Iceriver KAS KS5M?
The IceRiver KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS5M runs at 226.7 J/TH — a difference of 273.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 55% better efficacité (500 vs 227 J/TH).