IceRiver KS3 vs Iceriver KAS KS5M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS3 | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS5M |
|---|---|---|
| 8.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 15.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 400.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 226.7 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS3
Iceriver KAS KS5M
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver KAS KS5M comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 88% more hashrate (8.0 vs 15.0 TH/s) in the Iceriver KAS KS5M's favour. The IceRiver KS3 claws back ground on consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver KS3 and Iceriver KAS KS5M actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 88% more hashrate (8.0 vs 15.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS3 6% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 43% better efficacité (400 vs 227 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS3 4% better weight (14.4 vs 15.0 kg)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 6% more heat output (10,918 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| IceRiver KS3 | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS5M |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $449 |
| -$7.39 | Daily net profit | -$7.62 |
| -$12,698 | Net after 1 year | -$3,230 |
| -$15,396 | Net after 2 years | -$6,012 |
| -$18,094 | Net after 3 years | -$8,793 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS5M226.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the IceRiver KS3 or Iceriver KAS KS5M more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS3 is more profitable at $-7.39/day compared to $-7.62/day for the Iceriver KAS KS5M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the IceRiver KS3 or Iceriver KAS KS5M?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
IceRiver KS3 vs Iceriver KAS KS5M: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between IceRiver KS3 and Iceriver KAS KS5M?
The IceRiver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS5M runs at 226.7 J/TH — a difference of 173.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 43% better efficacité (400 vs 227 J/TH).