IceRiver KS3 vs Iceriver KS1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS3 | Specification | Iceriver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| 8.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 600 W |
| 400.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS3
Iceriver KS1
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the IceRiver KS3, which leads on 2 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 700% more hashrate (8.0 vs 1.0 TH/s). The Iceriver KS1 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the IceRiver KS3 and Iceriver KS1 sit on each measurable spec:
- IceRiver KS3 700% more hashrate (8.0 vs 1.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS1 81% better power draw (3,200 vs 600 W)
- IceRiver KS3 33% better efficacité (400 vs 600 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS3 3% better weight (14.4 vs 14.9 kg)
- IceRiver KS3 433% more heat output (10,918 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS1 22% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| IceRiver KS3 | Metric | Iceriver KS1 |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $199 |
| -$7.39 | Daily net profit | -$1.40 |
| -$12,698 | Net after 1 year | -$711 |
| -$15,396 | Net after 2 years | -$1,224 |
| -$18,094 | Net after 3 years | -$1,736 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS1Score: 44/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS3400.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the IceRiver KS3 or the Iceriver KS1?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS1 is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-7.39/day for the IceRiver KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the IceRiver KS3 or the Iceriver KS1 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the IceRiver KS3 or Iceriver KS1?
The Iceriver KS1 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
IceRiver KS3 vs Iceriver KS1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The IceRiver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS1 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 200.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 33% better efficacité (400 vs 600 J/TH).