IceRiver KS3 vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| IceRiver KS3 | Specification | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| 8.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 10.5 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 3,600 W |
| 400.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 342.9 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,283 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
IceRiver KS3
Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 31% more hashrate (8.0 vs 10.5 TH/s). The IceRiver KS3 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the IceRiver KS3 and Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 31% more hashrate (8.0 vs 10.5 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS3 11% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,600 W)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 14% better efficacité (400 vs 343 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS3 1% better weight (14.4 vs 14.5 kg)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 13% more heat output (10,918 vs 12,283 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS3 20% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| IceRiver KS3 | Metric | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,540 |
| -$7.39 | Daily net profit | -$8.26 |
| -$12,698 | Net after 1 year | -$8,556 |
| -$15,396 | Net after 2 years | -$11,571 |
| -$18,094 | Net after 3 years | -$14,587 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS3Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)342.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the IceRiver KS3 or Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS3 is more profitable at $-7.39/day compared to $-8.26/day for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the IceRiver KS3 or the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the IceRiver KS3 or Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)?
The IceRiver KS3 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
IceRiver KS3 vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The IceRiver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH while the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) runs at 342.9 J/TH — a difference of 57.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 14% better efficacité (400 vs 343 J/TH).