Antminer KS5 vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer KS5 | Specification | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| 20.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 10.5 TH/s |
| 3,000 W | Consommation électrique | 3,600 W |
| 150.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 342.9 J/TH |
| 76 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 15.8 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 10,236 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,283 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer KS5
Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer KS5 edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). Where it pulls away hardest is 56% better efficacité (150 vs 343 J/TH). That said, the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer KS5 and Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer KS5 90% more hashrate (20.0 vs 10.5 TH/s)
- Antminer KS5 17% better power draw (3,000 vs 3,600 W)
- Antminer KS5 56% better efficacité (150 vs 343 J/TH)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 1% better noise (76.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 8% better weight (15.8 vs 14.5 kg)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 20% more heat output (10,236 vs 12,283 BTU/hr)
- Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) 3% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer KS5 | Metric | Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) |
|---|---|---|
| $12,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,540 |
| -$6.48 | Daily net profit | -$8.26 |
| -$14,365 | Net after 1 year | -$8,556 |
| -$16,730 | Net after 2 years | -$11,571 |
| -$19,096 | Net after 3 years | -$14,587 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T)Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer KS5150.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer KS5 or Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer KS5 is more profitable at $-6.48/day compared to $-8.26/day for the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer KS5 vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Antminer KS5 at 76 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer KS5 vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T): which fits a residential setup better?
The Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Antminer KS5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer KS5 vs Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer KS5 runs at 150.0 J/TH while the Dragonball KS6 Pro (10.5T) runs at 342.9 J/TH — a difference of 192.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 56% better efficacité (150 vs 343 J/TH).